www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rght of exclusive licensee to sue third party for infringment[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by JOY L. DEAL on February 19, 2002 at 17:21:55: In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rght of exclusive licensee to sue third party for infringment posted by M Arthur Auslander on February 18, 2002 at 21:48:57: : : : Dear Mr. Auslander, : : : Thank you for your prompt reply. : Dear M, : NO. : M. Arthur Auslander : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
Mr. Auslander is the expert here. However, my understanding is, the licensor shall thereupon have the right, but not the obligation, to take whatever action it deems necessary, including the filing of lawsuits, to protect the rights of the parties to this agreement and to terminate such infringement. Licensee shall cooperate with licensor if licensor takes any such action, but all expenses of licensor shall be borne by licensor. If licensor does not wish to take any action hereunder, licensee shall also have the right, but not the obligation, to take any such action, in which case licensor shall cooperate with licensee, but all of licensee's expenses shall be borne by licensee. Licensee shall receive 75% of any damages or compensation it recovers for such infringment and shall pay 25% of such damages or compensation to licensor, after deducting its cost. I understand you to say, can B sue if only a portion of the patent is licensed? According to patent infringment law, infringment has occured if only one claim of the patent is infringment. Again, I am no expert, but I would have to think you had a case. Mr. Auslander please don't blast me. It is just quality conversation.
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Patent Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |