www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: New use for an existing device that is not patented


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M Arthur Auslander on December 17, 2001 at 23:15:55:

In Reply to: New use for an existing device that is not patented posted by J.L. Deal on December 17, 2001 at 17:48:37:

: Could someone please expalin what "A new use for and existing device" means. If a patent is obtained and it is used for something different and there is no prior art or articles or patent on the new use, is the patent valid?

Dear J.L. Deal,

You are entitled to a patent if the invention is "New, Useful and Unobvious". A patent can be obtained for a new device or a new "method" of doing something.

A new use for a know device, may be patentable. There may be a problem though. Even if you get a patent, if the device that is used is patented, the new use may infringe the existing patent.

One has to understand the subtleties of the law. Just getting a patent may be a great way of spending money without getting a return.

You have to find a Registered Patent Lawyer you can trust to understand what is best to do in YOUR interest.

There is a scam industry making $100M+ a year getting patents for inventors. Only 1 in 10,000 make more money than they pay.

There are even some registered patent lawyers, particularly who advertize extensively that say yes to clients, get them patents, whose claims are avoidable. Thus the inventor has a patent but the patent does not give the protection that the inventor needs to make money.

Recently an inventor came me with a patent, complaining that wherever he went to saw his invention in use. An examination of the patent showed that the patent disclosed the invention but the patent claims, which protected the invention, were completely avoidable. That means the patent disclosed the idea but the important part of the patent, the claims did not protect the invention.

You need a Registered Patent Lawyer you can trust.

M. Arthur Auslander

Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop(sm)
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive(sm)




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: New use for an existing device that is not patented

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Patent Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Patent Forum
www.intelproplaw.com