Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I need a patend agent .
[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]
Posted by Attorney vs. Agent on September 26, 2001 at 00:18:02:
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: I need a patend agent . posted by M. Arthur Auslander on September 25, 2001 at 08:47:41:
: Dear Know it all, [Dear Sir,] [Thank you for your "unable-to-accept-opposing- points-of-view", attitude-laden response. I am sure this type of response gets you many clients.] : A patent lawyer has all the qualifications of a patent agent plus the ability to have a better legal insight as to what to do and how to do it. [last portion of your statement is arguable] : You can get screwed with an agent as well as an attorney. It is a question of finding someone that you trust that can do the job. [very true, see my initial response supra] : The big firms can [do] charge more and have an associate write the application. [oops, I let the secret out] : The big thing you miss is that attorney or agent both can almost assure you that you will get a patent but ----- how many will tell you not to file because what you have may be a dead looser even with a patent. [your previous statement has nothing to do with an agent or attorney:] [It has to do with morals, ethics. Much like spewing forth anti-agent rhetoric] [further, see my initial response supra concerning worthless patents] [ I hope you have a nice day...Attorney v Agent] : M. Arthur Auslander : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : 505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 : 212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com : ELAINE's Workshop™ : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|