www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: inventive step

[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on April 26, 2001 at 03:52:25:

In Reply to: inventive step posted by dauphin pickard jnr on April 25, 2001 at 14:04:50:

: If an obviousness rejection is based on the lack of invetivestep then how on earth can you get around this problem? Would using swiss type claim format be of use?

Dear Dauphin Picard jnr,

Need to see the whole situation. What is a swiss type format?

M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop (sm)
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive




Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: inventive step

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.

This is the Old Patent Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.

Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Patent Forum		 www.intelproplaw.com