www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
Re: First to Invent Clause[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on December 02, 2000 at 04:40:37: In Reply to: First to Invent Clause posted by Terry Smith on December 01, 2000 at 22:52:21: : Frank D'Angelo on November 9th stated that he could prove he had prior art from 1989, on a patent that had been issued to two other inventors’ in January 2000. Frank asks if he could make a claim. I am assuming that Frank would like some type of royalties or compensation from the inventors of the January 2000 patent. : This brings up another question. Litigation can be expensive. Could Frank, simply manufacture and market his own product and compete with the other inventors? If challenged by the inventors of the 2000 patent, he could then hire an attorney to present his prior art : Terry Dear Terry, A suppression of the information for a fee may be a legal problem for both parties. Any party is free to do what does not infringe the valid claims of a patent. Patent litigation is expensive, even for the lawyers, who can get very large fees. The details of a problem like this cannot be solved on a Forum. Whether you like it or not you need competant legal advice that you can trust. M. Arthur Auslander
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Patent Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |