www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: patent inclusions


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by David Musker on July 31, 2000 at 03:20:29:

In Reply to: patent inclusions posted by Fran Coughlin on July 28, 2000 at 11:39:58:

: At the time I hire an attorney or apply for a patent,
: must I have all the possible specifications? I think I need a design
: patent. Do I need to say, "this should be leather, polyester, or hemp.
: This seam should be sewn or grommeted or stapled. This should be a
: clip, an O-ring, etc., etc.?" Must I encompass every possibility
: including how much weight or strain it must tolerate - or just state the
: design. If you could respond with this information, I will know how to
: proceed. I have an idea for something useful which I haven't seen and a
: prototype, but I'm not a scientist. Thank you.

Always speak to an attorney if you can afford it. Otherwise, file it yourself in the best shape you can.

This is no substitute for legal advice, but here are some basic principles for regular (i.e. not design) patents:

1 - you've got to have enough detail that a person of ordinary skill (that is probably a pretty low level person) can make the invention work. But remember that the people assessing this aren't average workers in the field - they are Patent Office Examiners, Judges and Juries. So, if in doubt, put the detail in - you never know when it might come in handy.

2 - you shouldn't keep back any details that are important to working the invention - the public (in the US) have a right to know the best mode known to the inventor.

3 - if you want a broad patent that is hard for an infringer to walk around, put in plenty of alternatives if they occurr to you.

But as I say, this is what patent attorneys are trained to help you with - don't try to do it yourself unless you really can't afford help!

Design patents are different - they protect the way things look, not how they work. So if that really is appropriate (and you may be wrong in thinking it is - they are much more rarely used than regular patents) maybe the detail you mention is unneccessary.

David C Musker
European Patent Attorney




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: patent inclusions

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Patent Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Patent Forum
www.intelproplaw.com