www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
Re: patent inclusions[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by David Musker on July 31, 2000 at 03:20:29: In Reply to: patent inclusions posted by Fran Coughlin on July 28, 2000 at 11:39:58:
: At the time I hire an attorney or apply for a patent, Always speak to an attorney if you can afford it. Otherwise, file it yourself in the best shape you can. This is no substitute for legal advice, but here are some basic principles for regular (i.e. not design) patents: 1 - you've got to have enough detail that a person of ordinary skill (that is probably a pretty low level person) can make the invention work. But remember that the people assessing this aren't average workers in the field - they are Patent Office Examiners, Judges and Juries. So, if in doubt, put the detail in - you never know when it might come in handy. 2 - you shouldn't keep back any details that are important to working the invention - the public (in the US) have a right to know the best mode known to the inventor. 3 - if you want a broad patent that is hard for an infringer to walk around, put in plenty of alternatives if they occurr to you. But as I say, this is what patent attorneys are trained to help you with - don't try to do it yourself unless you really can't afford help! Design patents are different - they protect the way things look, not how they work. So if that really is appropriate (and you may be wrong in thinking it is - they are much more rarely used than regular patents) maybe the detail you mention is unneccessary. David C Musker
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Patent Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |