The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 12th, 2020, 2:03pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
Is it Patentable?
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   One year rule and Patentability
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: One year rule and Patentability  (Read 2899 times)


Posts: 11
Re: One year rule and Patentability
« Reply #25 on: Dec 2nd, 2006, 4:18pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Hi everyone,
Wiscagent, you are correct that the protection a "means for" claim affords is limited to equivalents of what is disclosed in the specification, but this still gives much room for many alternatives & various embodiments that my not be obvious in view of the specification or prior art combined.  
My point was that a claim can be worded to provide protection for a design and various alternatives and/or equivalents, without actually rendering the alternative embodiments obvious due to the wording of the claim.
I did not mean to imply that claims are read or interpreted in a vacuum, you always have to take what is disclosed and/or suggested by the specification into consideration when defining the scope of coverage or protection a patent claim provides.  
Thanks for your feedback.
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board