The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 16th, 2019, 12:04am

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Is it Patentable?
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Wood Art
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Wood Art  (Read 1077 times)
Crackpot
Guest
Re: Wood Art
« Reply #5 on: Apr 26th, 2006, 12:13pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

OK, I too am shamed. I meant to say:
 
Where does 35 USC 102b list public disclosure as a barring activity?  
Public use does NOT require public disclosure and does not require any determination of whether anyone saw the use.
(the NOT is added here to correct my statement.)
 
The point I'm trying to make regards the term "public disclosure." It seems to be some kind of slang term directed toward all the events listed in 35 USC 102b. Essentially everytime I've heard the term it has led to questionable presumptions or utterly false conclusions.
 
For example, I've argued that the use of a novel yard tool in an inventor's front yard entailed public use.  People working with me in the related forum argued that I could not know that the invention was disclosed because the inventor did not know if anyone saw the use. I argued it did not matter whether anyone saw or whether anything was actually disclosed to anyone. The people working with me were not patent professionals but were engaged in invention related professions.
 
This discourse has prompted me to consider investigating the origin of the "public disclosure" term and concept.
 
If anyone has any tips on that investigation ... please reply.
 
Thanks!
IP Logged
wallflower
Junior Member
**




   


Posts: 96
Re: Wood Art
« Reply #6 on: Apr 26th, 2006, 12:18pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Apr 26th, 2006, 11:52am, E. L. Shumaker wrote:
Thank you all for your input.  
 
As for the process of creating the "work", the door might be open for a patent if I did not display the making of the "work" in public. (which I have not).
 

 
That is not correct.  I thought Isaac had a post about the Metallizing case, but I don't see it anymore.    The case held that an inventor's use of a secret process along with the open sale of a product of that process will be a "public use" of the process.  Public use is a statutory bar under 102(b).
IP Logged
Isaac
Senior Member
****




   


Posts: 3472
Re: Wood Art
« Reply #7 on: Apr 26th, 2006, 1:39pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I deleted my post because it seemed a bit too patronizing in tone, and others seemed to have no problem coming up with the right answer.
« Last Edit: Apr 26th, 2006, 1:39pm by Isaac » IP Logged

Isaac
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board