The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 18th, 2019, 7:46pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Obviousness
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Help you to successfully obtain Patent in China
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Help you to successfully obtain Patent in China  (Read 830 times)
bandcnlawyer
Newbie
*




   


Posts: 10
Help you to successfully obtain Patent in China
« on: Nov 8th, 2007, 7:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

-------The inventiveness of patent  
Source: LIAONING BANDCN LAW FIRM   written by : Fangfang Wang
Inventiveness is one of the necessary conditions for patent right of invention and creation. The difference  
 
between the invention-creation and public technology which is called the “novelty” is the first condition for  
 
patent right, but the given degree of difference is also required by the Patent Law, that’s to say the  
 
inventiveness of invention and utility model.
 
 
 
But what’s the inventiveness? How to judge whether the invention and creation has inventiveness?  
 
According to Patent Law, Inventiveness means that, as compared with the technology existing before the  
 
date of filing, the invention has prominent substantive features and represents a notable progress and  
 
that the utility model has substantive features and represents progress.  
 
So, prominent substantive features and a notable progress need to be owned by invention patent. The  
 
utility model patent is also ordered to possess of substantive features and progress. The conditions of  
 
inventiveness of invention patent are correspondingly higher than the ones of utility model. This passage  
 
will focus on the invention patent and explain the inventiveness of invention patent.
 
 
 
According to Guideline of Investigation issued by State Intellectual Property Office, the invention with  
 
prominent substantive features means the invention which the common technicists in the related field of  
 
technology can’t produce on the basis of public technology by means of logistic analysis, illation and  
 
limited examination.
 
 
 
The invention with a notable progress means the invention which can produce profitable technical effect  
 
compared with public technology, such as overcoming defects of public technology, or making great  
 
progress in comparison with public technology.
 
 
 
According to Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of PRC, the technology used to be compared  
 
with the invention of application is the technology which has been publicly disclosed in publications in the  
 
country or abroad, or has been publicly used or made known to the public by any other means in the  
 
country, before the date of filing. Unlike investigation of novelty, the inventiveness of invention of  
 
application shall be judged in comparison only with public technology, not including the conflicting  
 
application said in the last passage.
 
 
 
The inventiveness shall be judged by the common technicists in the related field of technology. During  
 
the investigation of inventiveness, although the conclusion is made by investigators, investigators make  
 
this conclusion on the basis of the knowledge and ability of the common technicists in the related field of  
 
technology, but not of the investigators themselves. The common technicists in the related field of  
 
technology are introduced by the Patent Law with the aim to pursue fair and objective investigation.  
 
Generally, the said common technicists are supposed to be the technicists with common technology who  
 
are able to acquire the public technology and to do some routine experiments, but not the experts in this  
 
field of technology.
 
 
 
The following steps shall be obeyed when you judge whether your invention of application has  
 
inventiveness required by Patent Law:
 
 
 
First, to find out the most similar public technology ; Second, to find out which technical problem your  
 
invention can work out and compare your invention with the most similar public technology; Third, to  
 
judge whether your invention of application is obviously or easily to be obtained by the common  
 
technicists in the related field of technology.
 
 
 
Regarding with a notable progress, compared with the inventiveness, it’s easier to judge the notable  
 
progress which mainly focus on the profitable technical effects or makes great progress. In the following  
 
situations, the invention is deemed to have a notable progress:
 
First, compared with public technology, the invention of application are able to produce better technical  
 
effects, such as, quality improvement, quantity increase, energy saving, environment pollution  
 
prevention.
 
 
 
Second, the invention of application provides another different technical proposal, and the technical  
 
effects basically arrive at the level of public technology.
 
 
 
Third, the invention of application stands for the new trend of some new technology.
 
Fourth, although the invention of application has some negative effects, the other aspects of the  
 
invention possess of notable active technical effects.
 
 
 
This passage mainly introduces and analyzes the principia obeyed when judging the inventiveness of  
 
your invention of application, the next passage will give you some good and operable methods to help  
 
you to judge the inventiveness of you invention of application.
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2007, 7:03pm by bandcnlawyer » IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board