The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 5th, 2023, 1:11pm


Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
   Obviousness (Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   no teaching, suggestion or movitation to combine		 « Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: no teaching, suggestion or movitation to combine  (Read 1330 times)
wade
Newbie
*




   


Posts: 25
no teaching, suggestion or movitation to combine
« on: Jun 26th, 2007, 9:03am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
when we response a 103(a) rejection, we will say "there is no teaching, suggestion or movitation to combine the reference A and reference B", how to understand the sentence? The sentence includes three? One is "no teaching to combine", one is "no suggestion to combine" and the last one is "on movitation to combine"?
in what condition we use this way to argue? and this is a strong reason to overcome 103 rejection?
 
Thanks
IP Logged
TataBoxInhibitor
Full Member
***




   


Posts: 456
Re: no teaching, suggestion or movitation to combi
« Reply #1 on: Jun 26th, 2007, 11:59am »		 Quote Quote Modify Modify
If you read the "obviousness" section on this site, the MPEP and KSR v. Teleflex, you can get some info to help you answer your question.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board