The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Sep 18th, 2020, 6:30pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Obviousness
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Single-reference obviousness rejections
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Single-reference obviousness rejections  (Read 8511 times)
Isaac
Senior Member
****




   


Posts: 3472
Re: Single-reference obviousness rejections
« Reply #10 on: Dec 5th, 2006, 8:13am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Dec 4th, 2006, 5:22pm, Guestman wrote:
This will not happen.  Outside of an anticipation rejection under 35 USC 102 then properly made 35 USC 103 rejections are extremely valid.  If the prior art teaches or suggests the combination then no patent should be granted to the claims.

 
I think the intent of the question was to explore what happens if a showing of TSM becomes unnecessary for a valid 103 rejection.   I don't believe any of us expect that previously valid rejections are going to become unacceptable.
IP Logged

Isaac
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board