The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jul 3rd, 2020, 5:06pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   New Usage
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: New Usage  (Read 588 times)


Posts: 15
New Usage
« on: Sep 27th, 2006, 6:33pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

If a problem has been around for say 5 years and is costing lots of money to lots of people.  If I have a solution and have read maybe 50 related patents and a dozen graduate papers & whitepapers that all try to solve the problem but I still feel I have a better solution than all these that solves the problem in a completely different way, but that uses technology that's been around for longer then the exact problem.
If I apply for a patent and the examiner someday comes back with obviousness, can I point out the other solutions didn't think of it and were mucking around somewhere completely different to solve the problem?
IP Logged
Senior Member


Posts: 2584
Re: New Usage
« Reply #1 on: Sep 28th, 2006, 9:03am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Yes.  Will it be persuasive?  Who knows?  That type of argument is referred to as "long-felt need" and, if made adn supported properly, should prevail.
IP Logged

James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board