The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Apr 19th, 2019, 9:24pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Software and Business Process Patents
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242  (Read 9815 times)
camdenroberts
Newbie
*




   


Posts: 1
Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« on: Feb 15th, 2007, 12:01pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Hello
 
I am interested in starting a website similar to Elance.com. However, they filed a patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242.  For Elance to file claims against me, I would have to do EVERY single step of their process...is that correct?  If I took out a step or changed the method in anyway, they cannot file claims?
 
 
File claims as below
-----------------------------------
The invention claimed is:
 
1. A computer implemented method, comprising: accepting a posting on a website of a project that a buyer wants completed; providing a database containing all registered sellers; receiving a bid on the project from any seller, where all registered sellers are qualified to bid on postings in all categories; allowing the buyer to accept the
received bid from the seller; and allowing the buyer and the seller to work on the project in a collaborative workspace accessible by only the buyer and the seller, where the seller develops and delivers the project in the collaborative workspace and the buyer can track the
project in the collaborative workspace before it is complete.
 
IP Logged
JSonnabend
Moderator
Senior Member
*****




   
Email

Posts: 2251
Re: Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« Reply #1 on: Feb 15th, 2007, 3:14pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Every single step or the legal equivalent of every single step, yes.
 
- Jeff
IP Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
Wiscagent
Full Member
***




   


Posts: 843
Re: Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« Reply #2 on: Feb 16th, 2007, 8:02am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It is likely that there are other patents closely related to your business plan you should be evaluating as well.  A "right to practice" or "patent clearance" search and analysis can be a bottomless pit of time, energy, and money; nevertheless you should conduct whatever you feel is a reasonable search for your situation.  That's probably more than looking at one claim from one patent.
IP Logged

Richard Tanzer
Patent Agent
Isaac
Senior Member
****




   


Posts: 3472
Re: Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« Reply #3 on: Feb 16th, 2007, 9:28am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A patent holder might claim allege indirect or contributory infringement in situations where you don't perform all of the method steps, but where someone else uses your work to do so.
 
In other situations there might be a disagreement about whether you actually do peform step a or its equivalent. Filing a claim is not the same as proving infringement or liability, so a defense that you don't perform step a may not preclude being sued.
 
 
« Last Edit: Feb 16th, 2007, 9:29am by Isaac » IP Logged

Isaac
J.Choules
Newbie
*




   
WWW

Posts: 2
Re: Evaluating Patent U.S. Patent 7,069,242
« Reply #4 on: Apr 17th, 2007, 1:44am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

"If I took out a step or changed the method in anyway, they cannot file claims?"
 
Generally the owner of the patent (inventors and/or assignees) are entitled to the claimed invention or any 'obvious' improvement over the claimed invention.  In some cases it may be obvious to omit or change a step.  On the other hand a review of the file wrapper (Available on public PAIR on the USPTO website. Sorry I cannot provide a link) may show that some step or feature was argued as distinguishing from the prior art and thus the omission of that feature would not be ruled as obvious.  Further even if you do distinguish over the claim if the owner has deep pockets and wishes to eliminate your competition he could open litigation anyway hoping that you do not have resources to defend.  Thus it is not such a open and shut case of simply changing an element.   It would probably be a good idea to determine exactly what you wish to do and then talk to a patent attorney about possible conflicts.  
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board