|
Author |
Topic: Effect of a of species election on Claim Scope? (Read 1509 times) |
|
dab2d
Junior Member
 
Posts: 73
|
 |
Effect of a of species election on Claim Scope?
« on: Nov 20th, 2007, 1:30pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Does anyone know of a good case where the point at issue was whether an election of a species limited the scope of the claims. In the case I am working on, the Applicant, in response to a species requirement, filed a new very broad claim. The applicant states that the new claim reads on 3 of the six species designated by the examiner. Is the stucture of the claim anyway limited to the structure of the species the Applicant indicated under PE?
|
« Last Edit: Nov 20th, 2007, 1:30pm by dab2d » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Wiscagent
Full Member
  
Posts: 843
|
 |
Re: Effect of a of species election on Claim Scope
« Reply #1 on: Nov 20th, 2007, 5:01pm » |
Quote Modify
|
My first concern is - did the "new very broad claim" constitute new matter? If the application as originally filed disclosed A, B and C; and the new claim is for A-F (but D, E and F were not originally disclosed) then the claim represents new matter.
|
|
IP Logged |
Richard Tanzer Patent Agent
|
|
|
dab2d
Junior Member
 
Posts: 73
|
 |
Re: Effect of a of species election on Claim Scope
« Reply #2 on: Nov 20th, 2007, 5:10pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 20th, 2007, 5:01pm, Wiscagent wrote:My first concern is - did the "new very broad claim" constitute new matter? If the application as originally filed disclosed A, B and C; and the new claim is for A-F (but D, E and F were not originally disclosed) then the claim represents new matter. |
| It is more like the opposite. The disclosure is A, B & C, but the new claim is A & B. The new claim is broader/more generic, but the Applicant states that the new claim is generic only to 3 of the 6 species indicated by the Examiner. How much is the Applicant limited to the stucture as defined in the species that he indicated as reading on the borad claim?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
|