|
Author |
Topic: Infringement (Read 1522 times) |
|
shannu
Newbie

Posts: 13
|
 |
Infringement
« on: Oct 23rd, 2007, 6:37am » |
Quote Modify
|
All: The query pertaining to infringement: I gone through a US Patent claiming a process wherein a mixture of acid, phosphorous halide and a dehydrating agent is used. Further I encounter a US application (published in 2007) claiming a process wherein phosphorous trihalide and dehydrating agent is used (acid is avoided). There is no literal infringement however I want to know if there is an infringement under DOE? Please comments Regards
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alconada
Newbie

Posts: 14
|
 |
Re: Infringement
« Reply #1 on: Oct 29th, 2007, 1:09pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Do the prior art and your claimed process result in the same end product? If yes, are both processes comparable in terms of yield, etc? If yes, I would say that there is infringement under DOE because the acid is an arbitrary addition to the reaction without any technical effect.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
DJoshEsq
Full Member
  

Posts: 104
|
 |
Re: Infringement
« Reply #2 on: Oct 29th, 2007, 3:07pm » |
Quote Modify
|
DOE CANNOT be used to eliminate an element of the claims.
|
|
IP Logged |
D. Joshua Smith, Esq. Registered Patent Attorney McDonald Hopkins, LLC Cleveland, OH 216-348-5400
|
|
|
JSonnabend
Moderator Senior Member
    

Posts: 2251
|
 |
Re: Infringement
« Reply #3 on: Oct 30th, 2007, 10:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 29th, 2007, 3:07pm, DJoshEsq wrote:DOE CANNOT be used to eliminate an element of the claims. |
| While that may be true, there might be infringement nonetheless. If senior patent X claims A + B and junior patent Y claims A + B + C, chances are, the implementation of patent Y infringes patent X. No DOE required to "eliminate" anything. - Jeff
|
|
IP Logged |
SonnabendLaw Intellectual Property and Technology Law Brooklyn, USA 718-832-8810 JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
|
|
|
DJoshEsq
Full Member
  

Posts: 104
|
 |
Re: Infringement
« Reply #4 on: Nov 2nd, 2007, 1:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 30th, 2007, 10:45am, JSonnabend wrote: While that may be true, there might be infringement nonetheless. If senior patent X claims A + B and junior patent Y claims A + B + C, chances are, the implementation of patent Y infringes patent X. No DOE required to "eliminate" anything. - Jeff |
| Well that is obvious. I understood the question to be can patent claiming A+B+X sue someone for using A+B...then the other guy posted that maybe under DOE. Now as I reread the question, in jumbled English it talks about patent application and patent process. So it is unclear, to me, what the question is...
|
|
IP Logged |
D. Joshua Smith, Esq. Registered Patent Attorney McDonald Hopkins, LLC Cleveland, OH 216-348-5400
|
|
|
|
|