The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jan 28th, 2023, 5:33pm

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
Patent Drafting/Interpretation
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   patent drafting post KSR
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: patent drafting post KSR  (Read 2251 times)
Senior Member


Posts: 2584
Re: patent drafting post KSR
« Reply #10 on: Jun 28th, 2007, 8:58pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Maybe I should read the case again, but I see TSM as alive and well.  For all the bashing of TSM they did, they only explicitly overruled the Fed Circuit's requirements that (i) the motivation in the prior art be exactly the same as applicant's and (ii) ... I forget the second one, but it was a similar rather onerous technical thingy that I never asserted anyway.  Other than that, I never saw where TSM was any more than insulted -- not overruled and not significantly modified (aside from the two technical thingies).  I recall some suggestions that TSM could be one of a number of ways to show obviousness, but nothing eliminated it as a viable framework for showing obviousness and nothing else was offered as an alternative.
But the Court was very clear that merely finding all the parts in the prior art somewhere was insufficient.  As I recall, they may have described a rather modest level of requisite motivation -- perhaps lowering the bar in that respect.  And, as I've ranted before, I have yet to see an examiner ever assess the level of skill in the art as required by Graham -- and addressed implicitly in TSM analysis.  Until the examiners start addressing that, I'll be taking nearly all my cases through the BPAI.
IP Logged

James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
Bill Richards
Full Member

WWW Email

Posts: 758
Re: patent drafting post KSR
« Reply #11 on: Jul 15th, 2007, 10:25am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

The biggest problem is that the Court did not like TSM being applied in a rigid fashion.  Jim is correct, TSM is alive and well, it's just not the "be-all and end-all" it used to be.  In fact, if one reviews the post cert grant CAFC opinions and the post KSR opinion opinions, it's still there.
IP Logged

William B. Richards, P.E.
The Richards Law Firm
Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board