|
|
Author |
Topic: Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007 (Read 9974 times) |
|
CPLIP
Guest
|
 |
Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007
« on: Mar 30th, 2007, 1:02pm » |
 Quote  Modify
 Remove
|
Any advice for those participating in this program?
Employers:
1. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, & Feld (Houston, TX)
2. Alston & Bird (Charlotte, NC)
3. Amster, Rothstein, & Ebenstein (New York, NY)
4. Armstrong Teasdale (St. Louis, MO)
5. Arnold & Porter (Washington, DC)
6. Baker & Daniels (Indianapolis, IN)
7. Baker & McKenzie (Dallas, TX)
8. Baker Botts (Various Locations)
9. Banner & Witcoff (Chicago, IL)
10. Barnes & Thornburg (Indianapolis, IN)
11. Bell, Boyd, & Lloyd (Chicago, IL)
12. Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor, & Zafman (Sunnyvale, CA)
13. Brinks, Hofer, Gilson, & Lione (Chicago, IL)
14. Brooks Kushman (Southfield, MI)
15. Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, & Lindquist (Minneapolis, MN)
16. Connolly, Bove, Lodge, & Hutz (Wilmington, DE)
17. Cook, Alex, McFarron, Manzo, Cummings, & Mehler (Chicago, IL)
18. Cooley Godward Kronish (Palo Alto, CA)
19. Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated (San Antonio, TX)
20. Crowell & Moring (Washington, DC)
21. Darby & Darby, PC (New York, NY)
22. Day, Casebeer, Madrid, & Batchelder (Cupertino, CA)
23. Department of the Navy, Office of the General Counsel (Washington, DC)
24. Dewey BAllantine (Washington, DC)
25. Dickstein Shapiro (Washington, DC)
26. Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP (Cincinnati, OH)
27. Dorsey & Whitney (Minneapolis, MN)
28. Drinker Biddle Gardner Carton (Chicago, IL)
29. Dykema (Chicago, IL)
30. Faegre & Benson (Minneapolis, MN)
31. Fenwick & West (Mountain View, CA)
32. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett, & Dunner (Washington, DC)
33. Fish & Richardson (San Diego, CA)
34. Fitch, Evan, Tabin, & Flannery (Chicago, IL)
35. Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper, & Scinto (New York, NY)
36. Fletcher Yoder (Houston, TX)
37. Fogg & Powers (Minneapolis, MN)
38. Foley & Lardner (Chicago, IL)
39. Foley & Lardner (Madison, WI)
40. Foley & Lardner (Milwaukee, WI)
41. Foley & Lardner (Washington, DC)
42. Foley Hoag (Boston, MA)
43. Fredrickson & Byron, PA (Minneapolis, MN)
44. Frommer, Lawrence, & Haug (New York, NY)
45. Fulbright & Jaworski (Dallas, TX)
46. Godfrey & Kahn, SC (Milwaukee, WI)
47. Goodwin Procter (Boston, MA)
48. Goodwin Procter (New York, NY)
49. Greenblum & Bernstein (Reston, VA)
50. Hamilton Brook Smith Reynolds (Concord, MA)
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
CPLIP
Guest
|
|
Re: Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007
« Reply #1 on: Mar 30th, 2007, 1:03pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
51. Harness, Dickey, & Pierce (Troy, MI)
52. Haynes & Boone, LLP (Dallas, TX)
53. Hickman, Palermo, Truong, & Becker (San Jose, CA)
54. Howrey, Simon, Arnold, & White (Chicago, IL)
55. Howrey, Simon, Arnold, & White (East Palo Alto, CA)
56. Howrey, Simon, Arnold, & White (Houston, TX)
57. Howrey, Simon, Arnold, & White (Irvine, CA)
58. Howrey, Simon, Arnold, & White (Washington, DC)
59. Hunton & Williams (Washington, DC)
60. Jenner & Block (Chicago, IL)
61. Jones Day (Chicago, IL)
62. Kaye Scholer (New York, NY)
63. Kenyon & Kenyon (New York, NY)
64. Kilpatrick Stockton LLP (Atlanta, GA)
65. King & Spalding (Atlanta, GA)
66. Kirkland & Ellis (Chicago, IL)
67. Kirkland & Ellis (Los Angeles, CA)
68. Kirkland & Ellis (New York, NY)
69. Kirkland & Ellis (San Francisco, CA)
70. Kirkland & Ellis (Washington, DC)
71. Klarquist Sparkman (Portland, OR)
72. Knobbe, Martens, Olson, & Bear, LLP (Irvine, CA)
73. Kramer, Levin, Naftalis, & Frankel (New York, NY)
74. Krieg DeVault (Indianapolis, IN)
75. Latham & Watkins (San Diego, CA)
76. Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz, Mentlik (Westfield, NJ)
77. Leydig, Voit, & Mayer (Chicago, IL)
78. Lowrie, Lando, & Anastasi (Cambridge, MA)
79. Marger, Johnson, & McCollom (Portland, OR)
80. Marshall, Gerstein, & Borun (Chicago, IL)
81. Mayer, Brown, Rowe, & Maw (Chicago, IL)
82. Mayer, Brown, Rowe, & Maw (Houston, TX)
83. McAndrews, Held, & Malloy (Chicago, IL)
84. McDermott, Will, & Emery (Chicago, IL)
85. McDermott, Will, & Emery (Palo Alto, CA)
86. McDermott, Will, & Emery (Washington, DC)
87. McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff (Chicago, IL)
88. Merchant & Gould (Minneapolis, MN)
89. Michael, Best, & Friedrich (Chicago, IL)
90. Michael, Best, & Friedrich (Madison, WI)
91. Michael, Best, & Friedrich (Milwaukee, WI)
92. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley, & McCloy (New York, NY)
93. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, & Popeo (Boston, MA)
94. Morgan & Finnegan (New York, NY)
95. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius (Washington, DC)
96. Morris, Nichols, Arsht, & Tunnell LLP (Wilmington, DE)
97. Morrison & Foerster (Los Angeles, CA)
98. Morrison & Foerster (San Diego, CA)
99. Needle & Rosenberg (Atlanta, GA)
100. Nixon Peabody (Boston, MA)
101. Novak, Druce, & Quigg (Houston, TX)
102. Nutter, McClennon, & Fish (Boston, MA)
103. O'Melveny & Myers (Newport Beach, CA)
104. Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier, Neustadt (Alexandria, VA)
105. Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe (Irvine, CA)
106. Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA)
107. Patterson, Thuente, Skaar, & Christensen, PA (Minneapolis, MN)
108. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton, & Garrison, LLP (New York, NY)
109. Perkins Coie (Seattle, WA)
110. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, & Pittman (McLean, VA)
111. Polsinelli, Shalton, Flanigan, & Suelthaus, PC (Kansas City, MO)
112. Procter & Gamble Company - Intellectual Property (Cincinnati, OH)
113. Quarles & Brady (Milwaukee, WI)
114. Rader, Fishman, & Grauer (Bloomfield Hills, MI)
115. Ropes & Gray (Boston, MA)
116. Schulte, Roth, & Zabel (New York, NY)
117. Schwabe, Williamson, & Wyatt (Portland, OR)
118. Senninger Powers (St. Louis, MO)
119. Shook, Hardy, & Bacon, LLP (Kansas City, MO)
120. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom (Palo Alto, CA)
121. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom (Washington, DC)
122. Snell & Wilmer (Phoenix, AZ)
123. Sonnenschein, Nath, & Rosenthal (Chicago, IL)
124. Steptoe & Johnson (Washington, DC)
125. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox (Washington, DC)
126. Sughrue Mion (Washington, DC)
127. Sutherland, Asbill, & Brennan, LLP (Atlanta, GA)
128. Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer, & Risley (Atlanta, GA)
129. Townsend and Townsend and Crew (San Francisco, CA)
130. TraskBritt (Salt Lake City, UT)
131. Van Dyke, Gardner, Linn, & Burkhart (Grand Rapids, MI)
132. Vedder. Price, Kaufman, & Kammholz, PC (Chicago, IL)
133. Weil, Gotshal, & Manges (New York, NY)
134. Westman, Champlin, & Kelly (Minneapolis, MN)
135. Willkie, Farr, & Gallagher LLP (New York, NY)
136. Wilmer Hale (Boston, MA)
137. Wilmer Hale (New York, NY)
138. Wilmer Hale (Washington, DC)
139. Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice (Charlotte, NC)
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Guest1234
Guest
|
|
Re: Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007
« Reply #2 on: Mar 30th, 2007, 1:39pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Yeah,
Make sure either 1) you're at a top 14 school, where grades don't matter or either 2) your at a top 15 - 30 school, where grades matter a little bit.
Otherwise, for every other school, make sure you're either 1) and EE in the top 25 percent or 2) any other engineer in the top 15 percent
Good Luck
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
plex
Full Member
Posts: 168
|
|
Re: Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007
« Reply #3 on: Mar 30th, 2007, 2:55pm » |
Quote Modify
|
A PhD in a life science going to law school would also do well, not exactly sure what grades you would need from any of the non-top schools. Also, you need a technical degree of some sort to do most of the major IP work, even if you are from a top school.
|
| « Last Edit: Mar 30th, 2007, 2:56pm by plex » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
CPLIP
Guest
|
|
Re: Chicago Patent Law Interview Program 2007
« Reply #4 on: Apr 4th, 2007, 10:52am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Can anyone find the thread from last year's program. I tried, but the search function on this site blows. I think I remember reading some really helpful posts back then...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
Forums
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
Login
Register
Reply
Send Topic
Print