|
Author |
Topic: Question for USPTO people (Read 806 times) |
|
kajrare
Newbie

Posts: 7
|
 |
Question for USPTO people
« on: Nov 18th, 2005, 2:15pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I have a BSEE and have been working in sales & marketing for four years. I am thinking of working at the USPTO to see if I can work as a patent examiner, and may pursue law school after that. On the application to work as an examiner, it asks how many years of relevant experience I have. If I have not done any really technical work, would I put 0?? I did have technical internships during UG, but I found it boring and like the business side in sales/marketing.
|
« Last Edit: Nov 18th, 2005, 2:15pm by kajrare » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Isaac
Senior Member
   
Posts: 3472
|
 |
Re: Question for USPTO people
« Reply #1 on: Nov 18th, 2005, 7:13pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Sounds like you have 0 years of relevant experience. The USPTO does hire people right out of college so your lack of experience is not disqualifying. I am puzzled that someone who prefers the business and marketing aspects and found his technical internships boring would expect to find being a patent examiner enjoyable.
|
« Last Edit: Nov 18th, 2005, 7:14pm by Isaac » |
IP Logged |
Isaac
|
|
|
kajrare
Newbie

Posts: 7
|
 |
Re: Question for USPTO people
« Reply #2 on: Nov 21st, 2005, 7:01am » |
Quote Modify
|
Thanks for your response Isaac. I would be interested in being a patent examiner as a way towards law school, so even though it may be similar work, it would be in the direction I want to go. Thanks.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BTP
Newbie

Posts: 19
|
 |
Re: Question for USPTO people
« Reply #3 on: Nov 21st, 2005, 8:44am » |
Quote Modify
|
I've never worked as a patent examiner, and only you can determine whether you want to. However, I would point out that you can go to law school without being one. Speaking personally, if I had to be a patent examiner in order to have gone to law school, I wouldn't have gone. Your mileage may vary.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
|