|
Author |
Topic: Working for the USPTO (Read 453059 times) |
|
Wiscagent
Full Member
  
Posts: 843
|
 |
Re: Working for the USPTO
« Reply #205 on: Jan 1st, 2006, 7:59am » |
Quote Modify
|
Thanks for the clarification Isaac. Clearly you have knowledge of the inner workings of the USTPO, and I do not. Still, I think there is a parallel with the post office situation to extent that neither agency wants to have a situation in which non-exempt employees, or their union, sues the agency for assigning production goals that force unpaid overtime. Far more importantly ... I wish you and all the regular readers and contributors a happy, healthy, prosperous year in 2006. And don't forget ... no mail service tomorrow. Richard Tanzer
|
|
IP Logged |
Richard Tanzer Patent Agent
|
|
|
John Deaux
Guest
|
 |
Re: Working for the USPTO
« Reply #206 on: Jan 3rd, 2006, 12:58pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I will be getting a Master's degree in Molecular Science & Nanotechnology in August 2006 and would like to apply for an entry-level examiner position. I have several questions: (1) When should I plan to apply if I would like to start working sometime in September 2006? (2) I want to focus on nanotech patent examination - - I know that there is no dedicated TC for nanotech but which TC is the best to contact? Could/should I contact ALL of them that handle nanotech applications? (3) I received my J.D. in May 2005 from a top 50 law school - - is there anyway that having a J.D. can hurt my chances of becoming an examiner? Thanks.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Isaac
Senior Member
   
Posts: 3472
|
 |
Re: Working for the USPTO
« Reply #207 on: Jan 3rd, 2006, 2:14pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Some supervisor's are understandably suspicious that applicants with law degrees are going to bolt after a year or two. A couple of SPEs told me in explicit terms that they would not have hired someone with a law degree. OTOH there are a number of JD holders in the examining corp and there are some career opportunities at the PTO that require having a JD. I did get hired, and I did split shortly after the probationary 1 year period was up. There was another licensed patent attorney in my patent academy class, but he was a dissatisifed patent attorney looking to escape law firm work. I don't think people were nearly as anxious about retaining him.
|
|
IP Logged |
Isaac
|
|
|
alfredhorg
Newbie


Posts: 9
|
 |
Re: Working for the USPTO
« Reply #208 on: Jan 4th, 2006, 3:11am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 3rd, 2006, 12:58pm, John Deaux wrote:I will be getting a Master's degree in Molecular Science & Nanotechnology in August 2006 and would like to apply for an entry-level examiner position. I have several questions: (1) When should I plan to apply if I would like to start working sometime in September 2006? (2) I want to focus on nanotech patent examination - - I know that there is no dedicated TC for nanotech but which TC is the best to contact? Could/should I contact ALL of them that handle nanotech applications? (3) I received my J.D. in May 2005 from a top 50 law school - - is there anyway that having a J.D. can hurt my chances of becoming an examiner? Thanks. |
| I got an offer to work as an examiner immediately after I expect to get a J.D. in May, 2006. I hope to become a patent attorney for the USPTO, then an Administrative Patent Judge although there is a lot about the APJ job about which I do not know.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Isaac
Senior Member
   
Posts: 3472
|
 |
Re: Working for the USPTO
« Reply #209 on: Jan 4th, 2006, 6:38am » |
Quote Modify
|
IMO, it would be a good idea to take a shot at a state bar exam prior to going to work at the PTO. Otherwise, I suspect it will be some time before your schedule allows you to get around to doing so.
|
|
IP Logged |
Isaac
|
|
|
|
|