The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 21st, 2019, 5:44am

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Novelty
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Multiple devices, "one reference"
« No topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Multiple devices, "one reference"  (Read 1029 times)
Clifford D. Hyra
Guest
Multiple devices, "one reference"
« on: Dec 6th, 2007, 2:57pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

What do you say when an Examiner gives a 102(b) rejection but then cites to different devices/methods/whatever within that reference that are unrelated to teach the various limitations of the claims.  
 
For example, the Examiner cites to the actual "invention" of a reference for many limitations, but then cites to the background, where the reference discloses prior art that it teaches away from, for another limitation.  Clearly that prior art is not a part of the "invention" of the reference, but technically it is only one reference and hence the Examiner feels that a 102 is warranted.
 
The best I have been able to find in the MPEP is section 2131, stating that the elements in the reference must be arranged as required by the claim and that "the identical invention" must be shown.  Is there anything better than that?  There has to be clear case law on this issue, I would imagine.
IP Logged
patentsusa
Junior Member
**




   
WWW

Posts: 81
Re: Multiple devices, "one reference"
« Reply #1 on: Dec 15th, 2007, 2:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I think you hit the best argument right there.  
 
Even where a prior art reference includes all the elements that are claimed, where the arrangement of the claimed elements is different from the arrangement of the prior art elements, anticipation is not present.
« Last Edit: Dec 15th, 2007, 2:32pm by patentsusa » IP Logged

Deepak Malhotra, JD, BSEE
Registered Patent Attorney
Malhotra Law Firm
www.patentsusa.com
Clifford D. Hyra
Guest
Re: Multiple devices, "one reference"
« Reply #2 on: Dec 18th, 2007, 1:34pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify Remove Remove

Thank you for your reply.  I am glad to hear I was on the right track with my arguments.  Anyone know of any cases?
IP Logged
CriterionD
Full Member
***




   
WWW Email

Posts: 202
Re: Multiple devices, "one reference"
« Reply #3 on: Dec 20th, 2007, 2:48pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Dec 18th, 2007, 1:34pm, Clifford D. Hyra wrote:
Thank you for your reply.  I am glad to hear I was on the right track with my arguments.  Anyone know of any cases?

 
Feel free to play around with this search engine - Link
IP Logged

www.criteriondynamics.com
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« No topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board