The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 20th, 2013, 6:19am

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
   Other
   News
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers  (Read 5312 times)
JimIvey
Moderator
Senior Member
*****




  jamesdivey  
WWW

Posts: 2584
Re: No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers
« Reply #5 on: Apr 11th, 2005, 4:36pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Thanks for the concern.  I'm still not worried.  
 
If biting the crust off is "crimping" and/or the recited removal of the "crust portion", I'm ready to testify under oath that I performed such biting in various public forums (e.g., various public school cafeterias) at least 30 years ago.  Such is safe 102(b) prior art.  
 
So, if they come after me, they'll lose their patent.  It's best for them pursue infringement claims of new comers to the joys of crust-biting a PB&J who might not be aware of the long and illustrious history of that particular activity.
 
I already had lunch, but maybe tomorrow I'll make a PB&J, crimp the edge with my lips, and bite the entirety of the "crust portion" from my sandwich before eating it.  Maybe I'll even take pics just to flaunt it!  
 
What's a reasonable royalty on one sandwich?  I may have to go digging under sofa cushions and under the floormats in the car to settle the matter!
 
Regards.
IP Logged

--
James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
http://www.iveylaw.com
Isaac
Senior Member
****




   


Posts: 3472
Re: No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers
« Reply #6 on: Apr 11th, 2005, 6:55pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Jim, based on what I'm reading here, you might need to look
for change under three sofa cushions/car mats!
 
And what's next?  Sideways swinging?
 
Tongue firmly in cheek...
IP Logged

Isaac
JimIvey
Moderator
Senior Member
*****




  jamesdivey  
WWW

Posts: 2584
Re: No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers
« Reply #7 on: Apr 11th, 2005, 9:41pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Apr 11th, 2005, 6:55pm, Isaac Clark wrote:
And what's next?  Sideways swinging?

Hey, I personally practiced that invention and observed others practicing that invention in a public forum more than 30 years prior to the filing date of that application.  I have no problem swinging sideways as well.  Wink
 
Regards.
IP Logged

--
James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
http://www.iveylaw.com
gal
Newbie
*




   


Posts: 1
time to take action
« Reply #8 on: Apr 15th, 2005, 1:04pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify


if somone Pat.s  your idea that was conceived in a classroom situation how long do you have to take action against that individual and what does that action constitute?
IP Logged
Wiscagent
Full Member
***




   


Posts: 843
Re: No PB+J Method Patents for Smuckers
« Reply #9 on: Apr 15th, 2005, 1:29pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Gal asked “if somone Pat.s  your idea that was conceived in a classroom situation how long do you have to take action against that individual and what does that action constitute”
 
To answer Gal’s question, I have a few questions for her.
 
- Are you in the United States?
- Is this “idea that was conceived in a classroom” well documented; preferably signed, dated and witnessed?
- Has the application published, or has a patent actually granted?
- If the patent has granted, do the claims reflect the “idea that was conceived in a classroom” as documented?
- Why do you care?  Or asked another way, is anyone currently or expected to make money on the patent?
IP Logged

Richard Tanzer
Patent Agent
Pages: 1 2 3  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board