The Intellectual Property Law Server

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 26th, 2019, 2:29am

Forums Forums Help Help Search Search Members Members Calendar Calendar Login Login Register Register
   Intellectual Property Forums
  
  
Improvement Patents
(Moderators: Forum Admin, JimIvey, JSonnabend)
   Compositional Relationships and Patents
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Compositional Relationships and Patents  (Read 3073 times)
Chris_Whewell
Newbie
*




   


Posts: 20
Re: Compositional Relationships and Patents
« Reply #5 on: Mar 10th, 2004, 8:12pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Mar 9th, 2004, 6:12am, anup joshi wrote:
An absolute newbie to patent legalese, and my apologies in advance.  
 
I have a question pertaining to compositional designs.  
 
If A is a concept or an artifact, and I develop an artifact B  that is a superset of  concept of A in the artifact would I be infringing A ?
 
An example to further clarify :
 
Let us say  (hypothetically) I was the inventor of the car and wanted to patent it. The concept of revolute joints or bearings (analogous to concept A) was already patented.  
 
My invention (the car) fundamentally uses revolute joints, but the function of the whole (car) is what my concept (concept B)  is about as opposed to just the revolute joint or bearing which are utilized in transmitting motion from the drive shaft to the wheel.
Further Let us also say the conceptual equations of the joint are what I use but use a different material.  
Would I the (hypothetical) inventor of the car be stepping on patent A then?
Do I have to in any way be concerned about A ? If yes in what way ?
 
does anyone understand this?
 
Thanks,
 
 

 
 
Anup, a quick question:
 
Is your father a professor in Mumbai ?  I think I may have done some work for him relative to a variable timing camshaft engine combination a couple years ago.....  
 
?
 
To answer your question, it is possible to invent something which is within the broader claim of an existing patnet.  IN such a case, the person with the narrower invention cannot practice the inveniton without license from the owner of the broad patent.  HOwever, the owner of the broad patent cannot practice the narrower invention without license from the owner of the narrower patent.
 
I hope this helps.
 
Chris
 
 
 
 
 
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2!
Forum software copyright 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board