www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: Re: Natural law theories of copyright


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Copyright Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Jim Coleman on January 16, 2000 at 06:18:48:

In Reply to: Re: Natural law theories of copyright posted by M. Arthur Auslander on December 06, 1999 at 13:57:24:

Our notion of copyright law, and other IP law, is grounded in Natural Law. During the Constitutional Convention, there was substantial debate, primarily between Jefferson and Madison if I recall correctly, about whether there should be such a notion as legally protection of works of authorship or invention. Here my memory is faulty (I was not there!), but I think it was Madison who opposed the idea and Jefferson, himself an inventor, favored the protection. Jefferson argued that providing protection would induce inventors, in particular, to disclose their inventions so all could benefit. Without such protection, invention would revert to the concepts of the Medieval guilds who so jealously guarded their secret methods that those who disclosed them were often murdered or had their tongues cut out by the roots. Jefferson believed that by disclosing inventions, that is, making them "open" or "patent", others could improve on the inventions and all society could benefit. Madison was opposed on the notion that no one should or could own something that you could not hold in your hand or touch ("tangible property"). A compromise was worked out. The author or inventor received exclusive rights but only for a limited time. Thus, everyone benefits. As to other notions of Natural Law, remember that in those days, the belief was that authors and inventors were divinely inspired by flashes of insight. Thus, if the insight or "inspiration" (lierally, a "breathing in" as by a deity) came from a deity, then it was that deity's gift to all of mankind. Edison succinctly put the lie to this notion with his statement that genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. The "flash of insight" theory has few advocates today.

Jim Coleman
Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks
(and sometime lecturer at the University of Minnesota)
The Software Law Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
coleman@cs.umn.edu


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Natural law theories of copyright

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any copyright or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Copyright Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Copyright Forum
www.intelproplaw.com