www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
Re: Re: Re: Definition of Poor Man's Copyright[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Copyright Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by M Arthur Auslander on March 19, 2002 at 22:43:19: In Reply to: Re: Re: Definition of Poor Man's Copyright posted by dann hamer on March 19, 2002 at 15:03:05: : Thanks for your reply, Mr. Auslander. : I've designed my own CD lables and the copyright notice is on them. : I do have question from an earlier post: : posted by Joe Pesce on March 14, 2001 at 13:53:42: : : For my high school business management course, I need to know what is meant by "poor man's copyright?" Can anyone help me? : : Thanks very much : Dear Joe Pesce, : Under the old law some people would send their works to themselves, as a record of what they created. That was a poor mans copoyright as I understand it. : It was almost universally worthless. The registation fee then as I recollet was $6. There would have been more value sending it to a trusted stanger. : Even today at a $30 Official Fee it is better to know what you are doing and register. Under the present law, the work is covered by the creation. It is not enforceable until registered. : M. Arthur Auslander : ------------------------ : Something I don't understand is if the poor mans copyright is useless, what makes a song covered by creation any more protected? What proof of this creation shows who the owner/writer is? : One more question. : Thanks again, Mr. Auslander, and a thanks in advance. Dear Mr. Hamer, Patents, trademarks and copyrights, are Federally registerable, on a national basis. Thus your location does not effect the ability of a practicing attorney in another state effecting a national registration for you. M. Arthur Auslander Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Copyright Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |