www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: mud copyright


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Copyright Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on September 18, 2000 at 05:08:34:

In Reply to: mud copyright posted by Alex Nies on September 17, 2000 at 13:54:52:

: There is a MUD (multi-user dimension) game, where the owner of the game says that an unauthorized forum that discusses his game is in violation of his copyright.
: The forum doesn't post any direct copies of things in the game onto their site, but does refer to the game, and answers user's questions about how to do certain things within the game. Because the owner of the site doesn't want this information available, he says the forum is violating his "intellectual property." The moderators of the forum say they are within their 1st amendment rights to free speech, because they are simply discussing the game in question.
: I was wondering if there were any ideas as to who is right in this debate.

Dear Mr. Nies,

From what I understand what you have said, it seem as if the moderators are correct.

The copyright protects the intellectual expression created by the author and only prevents unauthorized copying of the expression.

The rules of the game if written, can be "used" by any reader. It is my belief that even a rexpression of those rules might not be a copyright infringement.

If the rules for playing chess were set out, and copyrighted by the first creator off the game, anyone could play the game and discuss the moves and use different words or modes of expression so that the game could be used and played by others without copyright infringment.

Some games may be patented. In which case the essence of the game might be protected. With a patent, a much more specific and complex analysis would be required.

A whole picture must be had to also consider the trademark law and the law of unfair competition to have an actual clarity, rather than this speculative abstaction of law.

M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop (sm)
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: mud copyright

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any copyright or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Copyright Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Copyright Forum
www.intelproplaw.com